Developing, manufacturing, possessing, acquiring, transporting, supplying, or using weapons and.Engaging in acts intended to cause extensive interference with, damage, or destruction to critical infrastructure.Engaging in acts intended to cause extensive damage or destruction to a government or public facility, public place, or private property.Engaging in acts intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to any person or endangers a person’s life.Amnesty International has called on the Philippine government to reject this legislation that contains dangerous provisions and risks further undermining human rights in the country. ![]() On 3 July 2020, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte signed into law the “Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020”, which replaces the Human Security Act of 2007. Once again, this shows why the UN should launch a formal investigation into ongoing widespread and systematic violations in the country.” “This law’s introduction is the latest example of the country’s ever-worsening human rights record. Legislation aimed at ‘countering terrorism’ must ensure respect for international human rights and humanitarian law and protect basic liberties. “The approval of this law grants the government excessive and unchecked powers. In the prevailing climate of impunity, a law so vague on the definition of ‘terrorism’ can only worsen attacks against human rights defenders. ![]() ![]() “This administration has effectively crafted a new weapon to brand and hound any perceived enemies of the state. “Under Duterte’s presidency, even the mildest government critics can be labelled terrorists. Responding to news that Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte signed the Anti-Terrorism Act into law, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific Regional Director, Nicholas Bequelin, said: News JPhilippines: Dangerous anti-terror law yet another setback for human rights
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |